Theology of John of Damascus on The Antichrist in the Eighth-Century Orthodox Church

Authors

  • Yusak Tanasyah Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Moriah, Tangerang
  • Gerald Frederico John Laoh Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Indonesia, Jakarta
  • Bebas Pinem Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Indonesia, Jakarta
  • Robby Robert Repi Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Injili Indonesia, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46495/sdjt.v13i2.231

Keywords:

John of Damascus, Antichrist, Eighth-century, Orthodox Church

Abstract

This study explores the theology of John of Damascus on the Antichrist within the context of the Eighth-Century Orthodox Church. Addressing a gap in existing scholarship, this research provides a comprehensive analysis of John of Damascus's eschatological views, particularly his depiction of the Antichrist, and examines their theological, historical, and cultural implications. Employing a historical-theological method, the research involves a detailed textual analysis of John of Damascus's works, contextualization within the Byzantine era, comparative analysis with contemporary and preceding theologians, and interpretation through theological frameworks. The study reveals that John of Damascus articulated a clear and systematic portrayal of the Antichrist, integrating it within his broader eschatological framework. His views were shaped by the historical and political milieu of the Eighth Century, notably the rise of Islam and internal theological disputes within Byzantium. John of Damascus emphasized the Antichrist as a significant heretical threat, advocating for vigilance and steadfastness in faith among the Christian faithful. His teachings were deeply woven into Orthodox doctrine, reinforcing the eventual triumph of Christ and the necessity of maintaining orthodox beliefs against heretical challenges. The findings underscore the lasting impact of John of Damascus's theology on the Antichrist in the Orthodox tradition, influencing subsequent theological developments and the Church's understanding of end-time events. This study highlights the importance of his eschatological perspectives, demonstrating how they were both reflective of and responsive to the theological and historical challenges of his time.

References

Athanasiou, Dimitris. “The Divine in the Theological Thinking of Saint John of Damascus in Relationship with Relevant Teachings of Theodore Abu Qurrah.” International Journal of Orthodox Theology 10, no. 4 (2019). https://www.orthodox-theology.com/media/PDF/4.2019/DimitrisAthanasiou.pdf.

Barus, Armand. “The Known Christ of Islam in Religious Dialogue.” Jurnal Amanat Agung 11, no. 1 (2015). https://ojs.sttaa.ac.id/index.php/JAA/article/view/197.

Bogataj, Jan Dominik. “Byzantine Theology and Islam: Paul of Antioch’s Irenic Approach.” Edinost in dialog 74, no. 2 (2019). https://www.teof.uni-lj.si/uploads/File/Edinost/74/02/Bogataj.pdf.

Borrut, Antoine, and Fred M. Donner, eds. Christians and Others in the Umayyad State. Chicago: THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, n.d.

Chrysostomides, Anna. “John of Damascus’s Theology of Icons in the Context of Eighth-Century Palestinian Iconoclasm.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 75 (2021): 263–296. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27107158.

Cuțaru, Caius. “A Great Father of the Church in Dialog with Islam: Saint John of Damascus.” Teolog 61, no. 4 (2014). https://www.revistateologia.ro/downloads/Teologia/4_2014/Caius.pdf.

Damascus, John. Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, Bk 1, Ch. XII. New York: Cosimo, 2007.

Hildebrand, Stephen M., ed. Basil of Caesarea, On the Holy Spirit. Crestwood: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2001.

Khouri, Sherene N. “John of Damascus’ John of Damascus’s Theological Methodology: An E s Theological Methodology: An Effective Way to Answer Islamic Objections.” Eleutheria 5, no. 1 (2021).

Matsoukas, Nikos. Dogmatic and Symbolic Theology 2. Thessaloniki: Pournaras Publications, 2006.

Milwright, Marcus. The Rock and Its Umayyad Mosaic Inscriptions. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.

Mourad, Suleiman A. “Umayyad Jerusalem: From a Religious Capital to a Religious Town.” In The Umayyad World, edited by Andrew Marsham. New York: Routledge, 2021. https://sophia.smith.edu/~smourad/SA Mourad--Umayyad Jerusalem.pdf.

Mushagalusa, Timothée B. “John of Damascus and Heresiology: A Basis for Understanding Modern Heresy.” University of South Africa, 2008. https://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/2200/thesis.pdf.

Sahas, Daniel J. “Cultural Interaction during the Umayyad Period: The ‘Circle’ of John of Damascus.” In Byzantium and Islam, 327–357. BRILL, 2021. https://brill.com/view/book/9789004470477/BP000027.xml.

“John of Damascus, The Fount of Knowledge III: On the Orthodox Faith.” Catholiclibrary. https://catholiclibrary.org/library/view?docId=/Synchronized-EN/npnf.000793.JohnOfDamascusExpositionOfTheOrthodoxFaith.AnExactExpositionoftheOrthodoxFaith.html&chunk.id=00000209.

“The Umayyads: The First Muslim Dynasty.” The Saylor Foundation. https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/HIST101-9.2-Umayyads-FINAL1.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-26

How to Cite

Tanasyah, Y., Laoh, G. F. J., Pinem, B., & Repi, R. R. (2024). Theology of John of Damascus on The Antichrist in the Eighth-Century Orthodox Church. SANCTUM DOMINE: JURNAL TEOLOGI, 13(2), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.46495/sdjt.v13i2.231

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): June

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 SANCTUM DOMINE: JURNAL TEOLOGI

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright:

SANCTUM DOMINE: Jurnal Teologi will validate, produce, disseminate, and act as steward in the long-term curation of every article published. In order to achieve this, the author typically requires a transfer or “assignment” of the copyright in the article. As is the case for open access publishing, the author (or copyright owner of the article, if different) signs an author publishing agreement.  The agreement incorporates the necessary transfer of copyright.

After assigning copyright, the author will still retain the right to:

  • Be credited as the author of the article.
  • Own and exercise any trademark or patent rights held by author and addressed in the article.
  • Make printed copies of the article to use for a lecture or class that the author leading on a non-commercial basis.
  • Share the article with friends, colleagues and influential people the author would like to read the work.
  • Present the article at a meeting or conference and distribute printed copies of the article on a non-commercial basis.

License:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
  3. ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  4. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.