Understanding the Responsibility of the Church for Urban Marginals Through Emmanuel Levinas' Thinking
Abstract
This study purpose to analyze the ethical responsibility of the church towards marginalized groups based on the ideas of Emmanuel Levinas. This research is qualitative-analytical using the library research method. This research shows that Emmanuel Levinas' thoughts regarding ethical responsibility can be a basis for the church to respond to the existence of marginalized people in urban areas. The ethical responsibility in question is the responsibility to maintain humanitarian actions, acknowledge their existence, provide attention and protect their rights as human beings. In this case, the church as an institution has a great ethical responsibility towards the marginalized, especially in the context of socio-economic justice.
References
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction A Social Critique Of Judgement Of Taste. Edited by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.
Dwi C.P. Urbanisasi Dan Permasalahannya. Digital. Semarang: ALPIRIN, 2019.
Frans Magnis-Suseno. Pijar-Pijar Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2005.
George Kunz. The Paradox of Power And Weakness: Levinas and an Alternative Paradigm for Psychology,. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998.
Hadijah, Zara, and Mohammad Isnaini Sadali. “Pengaruh Urbanisasi Terhadap Penurunan Kemiskinan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan 8, no. 3 (December 31, 2020): 290–306.
Harvey, David. Rebel Cities. from the Right to the City to the Right to the Urban Revolution. Eure. Vol. 40, 2014.
———. The Urban Roots Of Financial Crises: Reclaiming The City For Anti-Capitalist Struggle, n.d.
Levinas. Ethics and Infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo. Edited by Richard A. Cohen. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 1985.
———. Face To Face With Emmanuel Levinas. Edited by Richard A. Cohen. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1986.
Pasurdi, Suparlan. Kemiskinan Di Perkotaan. 1st ed. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 1993.
Perlman, Janice. Favela: Four Decades of Living on the Edge in Rio de Janeiro. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Ricardo Freedom N. Gereja Sosial Menurut Konsep Rasionalitas Komunikatif Jurgen Habermas. Yogyakarta: Deepublish Publisher, 2020.
Setiawan, H. “Fenomena Gelandangan Pengemis Sebagai Dampak Disparitas Pembangunan Kawasan Urban Dan Rural Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.” Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan 6, no. 2 (2020): 365. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/moderat/article/view/3218.
Sharon Todd. Levinas, Psychoanalysis, and Ethical Possibilities in Education. Albany: State University Of New York Press, 2003.
Sobon, Kosmas. “Etika Tanggung Jawab Emmanuel Levinas.” Jurnal Filsafat 28, no. 1 (February 28, 2018): 47.
Sugiyono. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta, 2005.
Suparyanto dan Rosad (2015. “Meneropong Ketimpangan Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Yahudi.” Stulos 5, no. 3 (2020): 94.
Thomas Hidya Tjaya. Enigma Wajah Orang Lain: Menggali Pemikiran Emmanuel Levinas. Jakarta: KPG, 2012.
Timotius. Gereja Yang Bertumbuh Dan Berkembang. Yogyakarta: ANDI, 2012.
Vika Azkiya Dihni. “Lebih Dari Seribu Gelandangan Berada Di Jakarta Pada 2020.” Databooks. Last modified 2021. Accessed April 14, 2023. https://katadata.co.id/. .
Copyright (c) 2023 SANCTUM DOMINE: JURNAL TEOLOGI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial used, distribution and reproduction in any medium
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
8.png){kind=logo}
