Inversi Moral dan Relativisme Etika Sosial di Era Pos Modern
Sebuah Kajian terhadap Yesaya 5:20
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46495/sdjt.v14i2.311Keywords:
Celaka, Etika Sosial, Inversi Moral, Relativisme Moral, Yesaya 5:20Abstract
Fenomena pembalikan moral dan relativisme berkembang pesat dan menciptakan ambiguitas, di mana batas-batas antara benar dan salah menjadi kabur. Beberapa penelitian telah berfokus pada arti kata celaka, struktur teks, dan tanggapan terhadap situasi politik, tetapi belum secara khusus mengeksplorasi dampak teologis dan sosial dari pembalikan moral dan relativisme. Fenomena ini telah tercermin dalam teks Yesaya 5:20 dan telah mengambil bentuk baru dalam budaya modern. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji makna pembalikan moral dalam teks Yesaya 5:20 dan hubungannya dengan relativisme moral, yang memiliki implikasi serius bagi etika sosial dan budaya, dan menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan hermeneutik profetik dari penafsiran teks, analisis sejarah, dan analisis sastra. Temuan ini mengungkapkan bahwa pembalikan moral menciptakan dilema etika, konflik internal, dan relativisme moral semakin mendominasi, sehingga mengaburkan batas antara benar dan salah. Dengan demikian, pendidikan etika yang kuat diperlukan untuk memperkuat landasan moral dalam perilaku sosial, hukum, dan interaksi antar individu. Artikel ini diharapkan dapat memberikan solusi holistik untuk mengatasi kebingungan moral, menjunjung tinggi nilai kebenaran, dan membangun komitmen umat beriman yang memiliki filter moral, di tengah dilema relativisme moral di era posmodern.
References
Basas. Jo Emm Floyd G. “The Meaning of the Word Woe in the Context of Isaiah 5,” 2024.
Basyir, Jalaluddin, and Ade Sukmawati. “The Impact of Pre-Marriage Pregnancy Mediatization in The Social Media To Indonesians Morality Hierarchy.” International Journal of Business, Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (IJBHES) 3, no. 2 (2022): 68–74.
Van Bavel, Jay J., Claire E. Robertson, Kareena del Rosario, Jesper Rasmussen, and Steve Rathje. “Social Media and Morality.” Annual Review of Psychology 75 (2024): 311–340.
Breck, John. “Chiasmus as a Key to Biblical Interpretation.” St Andrews Greek Orthodox Theological College, StVladimir’s Theological Quarterly, 43 No 3 - 4 1999, p 249-267 0036-3227, 1999.
Brown, William P. A Handbook to Old Testamen Exegesis. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press, 2017.
C. L. Crouch. The Cambridge Companion to the Hebrew Bible and Ethics. The Cambridge Companion to the Hebrew Bible and Ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
———. The Cambridge Companion to The Hebrew Bible And Ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
Chan, Aaron H Y. “Ethics in the Message of Isaiah.” Veritas, Volume 16, Nomor 1, Juni 2016: 47-66 Volume 16, no. Juni (2016): 47–66.
Chen, Jinyi. “Gender Inversion Phenomenon in the Internet and Social Media.” Communications in Humanities Research 19, no. 1 (2023): 1–8.
Cheng, Yu. “The Impact of Social Media on Deviance and Crime.” Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences 22 (2023): 873–877.
Clements, R. A. The New Century Bible Commentary, Isaiah 1-39. Grand Rapid, Michigan: William B Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1980.
Coulter, Katie. “Searching for Ethics’ Grounding : A Case for Moral Feeling and the Human Relationship to Nature.” Acta Cogitata 4 (2017): 59–65.
Davies, Andrew. “Texts, Themes, and Theologies: A Response to John Goldingay’s the Theology of the Book of Isaiah.” Journal of Pentecostal Theology 25, no. 1 (2016): 16–20.
Davis, Andrew M. Christ-Centered Exposition, Exalting Jesus in Isaiah. Edited by David Platt, DAniel L. Akin, and Tony Merida. Nashville, Tennessee: Holman, 2017.
Gensler, Harry J. Ethics A Contemporary Introduction. New York - London: Routledge Taylor & Francis, 2011.
Goldingay, John. Hosea-Micah: Baker Commentary on the Old Testament Prophetic. Edited by Mark J. Boda Gordon McConville. Grand Rapid, Michigan: Baker Academic, 2021.
Grey, Jacqueline N. “Isaiah’s Vision of Yahweh and Ethical Replication.” Old Testament Essays 31, no. 3 (2018): 591–612.
———. “Isaiah 5: A Prophetic Critique of Economic Proportion.” Verbum et Ecclesia 39, no. 1 (2018): 1–7.
Hanson, Paul D. Isaiah 40-66: Interpretation, A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching. Edited by OT Mays, James LutherPatrick D. Miller and NT Paul J. Achtemeier. Louisville, Kentucky: John Knox Press, 1995.
Hassan, Aumyo, and Sarah J Barber. “The Effects of Repetition Frequency on the Illusory Truth Effect.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications (2021).
Heuvel, Steven C. van den, Patrick Nullens, and Angela Roothaan. Theological Ethics and Moral Value Phenomena, The Experience of Value. London - New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.
Hoyt, Jo Anna M. “Discourse Analysis of Prophetic Oracles: Woe, Indictment, and Hope.” Hebrew Studies 60 (2019): 153–174.
Hrobon, Bohdan. “The Cambridge Companion to the Hebrew Bible and Ethics - 11. Religion and Ethics in Isaiah.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Hebrew Bible and Ethics, 163–177. Ontario: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
Joachim Eck. Asking Questions in Biblical TextIsaiah’s Woe Oracles against the Rulers of His People (Isaiah 10:1–4) and Assyrian Power (Isaiah 10:5–15). Leuven-Paris-Bristol, CT: Peeters Publisher, 2022.
Kendenan, E. S., M.R. Nababan, Sri Marmanto, and Dyah Ayu Nila Khrisna. “ An Analysis of Types and Functions of Parallelism in Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible .” Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT-8 2020) 579 (2021): 306–312.
Kinowski, Krzysztof. “Reinterpretation of History in the Books of Chronicles: The Case of King Manasseh.” Collectanea Theologica 90, no. 5 (2020): 193–220.
Klein, William W., Craig L. Blomberg, and Robert L. Hubbard Jr. Introduction to Biblical Interpretation, Third Edition. Grand Rapid, Michigan: Zondervan, 2017.
Laato, Antti. Isaiah in Ancient, Medieval, and Modern Jewish Traditions. The Oxford Handbook of Isaiah, 2020.
Lange, Armin, Bernard M Levinson, and Vered Noam. Metaphors in the Prophetic Literature of the Hebrew Bible and Beyond. Journal of Ancient Judaism Supplements. Vol. 36. Brill, 2024.
Laub, J S. Woe unto the Empire. Isaiah 5, 8-24 as a Postcolonial Prophecy, 2021.
Marchetti, Giancarlo. The Etics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty. New York - London: Routledge Taylor & Francis, 2022.
Mitchell Barry Evans, Jr. “Isaiah’s Theme of Judgment and Redemption Preached to The Congregation of Firt Calvary Baptist Church.” The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2017.
Muskita, Hudyard Y. “Justice, Cult, And Salvation In Isaiah 56-59: A Literary-Theological Study” (2016): 147, 11.
Park, Sung Jin. The Fundamentals of Hebrew Accents: Divisions and Exegetical Roles Beyond Syntax. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Pattinaja, Aska, Zefanya Puryana, and Farel Yosua Sualang. “Antitesis Pola Perkataan Karakter-Konsekuensi Pada Amsal 28:20 Sebagai Kualitas Hidup Orang Percaya Dalam Mengatasi Judi Online.” Sanctum Domine: Jurnal Teologi 13, no. 1 (2023): 113–134.
Pawson, David, and Andy Peck. Unlocking the Bible, A Unique Overview of the Whole Bible. Brpdway, New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2017.
Prabowo, Paulus Dimas. “Kaidah Penafsiran Puisi Perjanjian Lama.” HUPERETES: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen 3, no. 1 (2022): 13–24.
Rachels, James, and Stuart Rachels. “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism” (2019): 1–10.
Sale, Sapri. Kamus Indonesia Ibrani. Jakarta, Indonesia: Medras, 2020.
Scheuer, Blaženka. “Sin and Punishment in The Book of Isaiah.” In The Oxford Handbook of Isaiah. New York - NY: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Sianturi, Debora, Erwandi Sianturi, Jusuf Jr Simanjuntak, and Hisardo Sitorus. “Korupsi Dalam Tinjauan Etika Kristen.” Pediaqu : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Humaniora 4, no. 2 (2025): 1–23.
Stenschke, C. “Review For The Love of God’s Word: An Introduction to Biblical Interpretation Andreas Kostenberger, Richard D. Patterson.” Acta Theologica 39, no. 1 (2019): 246–249.
Streiffer, Robert. Moral Relativism and Reason for Action. Routledge Library Editions: Ethics. Vol. 40. London - New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2021.
Stulac, Daniel J.D. “Charting New Paths in Modern-Critical Exegesis: An Agrarian-Rhetorical Analysis of Isaiah 5.” Biblical Interpretation, 2019.
Stulac, Daniel J D. “Charting New Paths in Modern-Critical Exegesis: An Agrarian-Rhetorical Analysis of Isaiah 5.” Biblical Interpretation (2019).
Sualang, Farel Y. “Prinsip-Prinsip Hermeneutika Genre Hikmat Dalam Kitab Amsal: Suatu Pedoman Eksegesis.” Jurnal PISTIS (2019) 1(Old Testament, Genre of Wisdom, Hermeneutics) 93-112 (n.d.): 19.
Sualang, Farel Yosua. “Prinsip-Prinsip Hermeneutika Genre Hikmat Dalam Kitab Amsal: Suatu Pedoman Eksegesis.” Jurnal PISTIS 1, no. Old Testament, Genre of Wisdom, Hermeneutics (2019): 93–112.
Suikkanen, Jussi. “Moral Relativism and Moral Disagreement.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Disagreement (Chapter 28), edited by Maria Baghramian, Adam Carter, and Rach Cosker-Rowland. New York - NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis, 2025.
Sunstein, Cass R. “The Ethics of Nudging” (2015): 1–32.
Umeanolue, I L. “Critique against Social Injustice in the Book of Amos: Its Relevance to Development in Nigeria.” UJAH: Unizik Journal of Arts and Humanities (2018).
Walvoord, John F., and Roy B. Zuck. Major Prophet, The Bible Knowledge Commentary. Colorado Springs, CO 80918 U.S.A: David C Cook, 2018.
———. Major Prophets, The Bible Knowledge Commentary. Colorado Springs, CO 80918 U.S.A: David C Cook, 2018.
Wong, David B. “Moral Relativism.” International Encyclopedia of Ethics (2024): 1–13.
Zaluchu, Sonny Eli. “Metode Penelitian Di Dalam Manuskrip Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan.” Jurnal Teologi Berita Hidup 3, no. 2 (2021): 249–266.
———. “Strategi Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif Di Dalam Penelitian Agama.” Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat 4, no. 1 (2020): 28.
Zhang, Amy X., and Scott Counts. “Modeling Ideology and Predicting Policy Change with Social Media: Case of Same-Sex Marriage.” Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 2015-April (2015): 2603–2612.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 SANCTUM DOMINE: JURNAL TEOLOGI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
SANCTUM DOMINE: Jurnal Teologi will validate, produce, disseminate, and act as steward in the long-term curation of every article published. In order to achieve this, the author typically requires a transfer or “assignment” of the copyright in the article. As is the case for open access publishing, the author (or copyright owner of the article, if different) signs an author publishing agreement. The agreement incorporates the necessary transfer of copyright.
After assigning copyright, the author will still retain the right to:
- Be credited as the author of the article.
- Own and exercise any trademark or patent rights held by author and addressed in the article.
- Make printed copies of the article to use for a lecture or class that the author leading on a non-commercial basis.
- Share the article with friends, colleagues and influential people the author would like to read the work.
- Present the article at a meeting or conference and distribute printed copies of the article on a non-commercial basis.
License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
8.png){kind=logo}
